Release flow now points at main but has never run there — prove it before v0.4.0 #116
Labels
No labels
area: arcade
area: art-studio
area: calendar
area: chapel
area: content
area: design
area: field-guide
area: infra
area: library
area: os
area: portal
area: sync
area: typing
blocked
breaking
bug
content: approved
content: changes-requested
content: drafting
content: needs-doctrinal-review
content: needs-review
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
epic
github_actions
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
needs-triage
priority: high
priority: low
priority: medium
question
type: enhancement
type: feature
type: fix
type: perf
type: security
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Bosco/bosco#116
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Follow-up to #114. The ported git-cliff automation shipped with
on: push: branches: [develop]while its own header comments stated three times that the stable path is automatic onmain. Every push to the ungated integration branch therefore cut a public stable release.Cleaned up on 2026-08-14 (
9e53f89): trigger corrected tomain, and the five spurious releasesv0.3.1–v0.3.5deleted along with their lightweight tags.v0.3.0is again the latest release, matchingpackage.jsonand what production serves.What that leaves open:
mainis still a single empty commit, so no release has ever been cut from it. The next real release is also the first live test of the automation.CHANGELOG.mdstill opens by citing release-please conventions, and it is.prettierignored, so no gate will ever flag it. Itsgithub.com/BoscoApp/boscocompare links do not resolve either.mainbeing empty is now load-bearing. With the trigger onmain, the release model finally depends on the protected-mainconvention that Forgejo does not actually enforce (every branch reportsprotected: false).Worth doing as one pass before v0.4.0, since v0.4.0 is the first release that would exercise any of it.